ALMOST All Tasks Done (DRAFT)

Francisco Coelho
1 parent 75ead529
Showing 22 changed files with 449 additions and 1 deletions Show diff stats
pex2024/Tasks and Timeline.gdsheet
pex2024/candidatura.md
pex2024/documents/Application_Guide_PeX_2023.pdf
pex2024/documents/Application_Guide_PeX_2023_V2.pdf
pex2024/documents/Aviso_de_Abertura_PEX_2023.pdf
pex2024/documents/Aviso_para_Apresentacao_Candidaturas_PeX_2023_republicacao.pdf
pex2024/documents/Aviso_para_Apresentacao_Candidaturas_PeX_2023_republicacaoII.pdf
pex2024/documents/Data_Protection_PEX_2023.pdf
pex2024/documents/FAQ_PEX_2023_republicacao.pdf
pex2024/documents/MetodologiaAplicacaoCustosSimplificados_MontantesFixos.pdf
pex2024/documents/PeX2023_GuideforPeerReviewers.pdf
pex2024/documents/Protecao_Dados_Pessoais_PEX_2023.pdf
pex2024/documents/Regulamento_5_2024_ProjetosI&D.pdf
pex2024/documents/Regulation_on_projects_FCT_EN.pdf
pex2024/documents/zz-prev/Application_Guide_PeX_2023.pdf
pex2024/documents/zz-prev/Aviso_de_Abertura_PEX_2023.pdf
pex2024/documents/zz-prev/Data_Protection_PEX_2023.pdf
pex2024/documents/zz-prev/Ethics_Self_Assessment_Guide.pdf
pex2024/documents/zz-prev/Guiao_CIENCIAVITAE.pdf
pex2024/documents/zz-prev/Regulation_on_projects_FCT_EN.pdf
@@ -0,0 +1 @@
+{"url": "https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1rI6KWeT19Wcw7CTuUIyQNenzpTsW4VhBXbRtGVBFn6k/edit?usp=drivesdk", "file_id": "1rI6KWeT19Wcw7CTuUIyQNenzpTsW4VhBXbRtGVBFn6k", "account_email": "mangon@gmail.com"}
 \ No newline at end of file
 # Candidatura PEx - Zugzwang
  
+## Filling Application Form
+
+### General Data
+
+- Title:  Induction of Stochastic Answer Set Programs by Algebraic Means
+- Project Acronym: IAM
+- Keywords: (<= 4)
+- Main Scientific Area (Sci Domain + Sci Area + Sci sub-area):
+- Timetable: (Start date + duration)
+  
+### Institutions
+
+- Principal Contractor: (NIPC; Research Unit; description; competencies)
+- Collaborative Institutions: (All in the Portal de Ciência e Tecnologia?)
+
+### Research Team
+
+- Principal Investigator (name; role; ciencia Id; ciencia vitae in english)
+- PI narrative CV:
+  - Contributions to the generation of new ideas, tools, methodologies, or knowledge
+  - Contributions to the development of individuals and/or research teams
+  - Contributions to the research community and the broader society
+  - Selected outputs and/or activities
+  - Why would this grant be timely for me, at this point in my career path and/or in my research?
+- Members: (email; institution)
+- Hirings: (type (contract or scholarship); institution associated with the hiring)
+- Consultants: (email; framework fo participation)
+- Team CV synopsis: (justify the framework and competencies of the research team and its coherence with the proposed work plan)
+  - team scientific activity last 5 years
+  - most relevant scientific achievements
+  - demonstrate competence in the area
+
+### Work Plan
+
+- **Abstract.** summary in portugues and english; analysis state of the art; main goals; knowledge and skills in the group; strategy and methodologies; novelty; expected results.
+- **State of the art and Objectives.** overview of PI research field; state of the art in connection with ground-breaking nature and potential impact; references to PI previous work:
+  - To what extent does the proposed research address important challenges?
+  - To what extent are the objectives ambitious and beyond the state of the art (e.g. novel concepts and approaches or development between or across disciplines)?
+- **Research plan and methods.**
+  - To what extent is the outlined scientific approach feasible bearing in mind the originality and/or ground-breaking potential of the proposed research?
+  - To what extent are the proposed research methodology and working arrangements appropriate to achieve the goals of the project?
+  - To what extent are the proposed timelines, resources, and PI´s commitment adequate and properly justified?
+- **Bibliographic references.** (references cited in the state of art and in the research plan and methods)
+- **Past publications.** (five publications; articles, books or monographs published or accepted for publication, authored or co-authored by the PI and the members of the research team)
+- **Tasks.**
+  - **Task denomination**, concise and self-explanatory
+  - **Task description and expected results**
+    - objectives in the context of the project
+    - methodologies and approaches
+    - expected results and preconditions to subsequent tasks
+    - link to other tasks (?)
+    - role of each partner and institution
+    - justification for the needed resources (human and material)
+  - **Assigned** team members.
+  - **Person*month** person's percentage dedication * task duration in months
+  - **Start date; duration** (in months) -_no period without tasks_
+  - **Deliverables; delivery dates** (essential for effective project monitoring)
+    - type  (report; data management plan; websites; etc)
+    - _**Lump sums** are paid based on evidence and results showing achieved  deliverables and budged_
+  - **Budgets.**
+    - **Overall cost justification of the task**
+      - breakdown by budget item detail of how this value is obtained
+      - estimates must meet eligibility criteria of N.4 from "Public Announcement of the Call"
+    - **Amount requested for the task**
+      - Include 25% overheads
+      - Consistent with the _Principal Contractor Budget table in application form_
+      - Ensure "total amount of funding requested by institution" = "total costs of the tasks in which the institution participates"
+- **Project timeline and management.** list of milestones, the timeline and the description of the management structure
+  - **Milestones list**
+    - milestone = objective achieved; phase completed; result obtained
+    - include what can be demonstrated or reported on that date
+    - up to 6 milestones
+    - select tasks associated with the milestone
+    - mark milestones on the **timeline**.
+  - **Timeline**
+    - start with the available spreadsheet
+    - upload "timeline.pdf"
+    - Indicate **partner responsible for task**; **acronyms of partners involved**
+  - **Management** project management structure: coordination; meetings; reporting structure
+- **Ethical issues.** are any ethical issues identified in the project?
+- **2030 Agenda.** Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)
+  - identify **one, or up to a maximum of three**, of the 17 Sustainable
+Development Goals of the United Nations 2030 Agenda and justify how the application fits into the selected SDGs.
+- **Other projects.** Projects approved through peer review, led by the PI and started less than 5 years ago, completed or in progress should be listed. Additionally, please detail all projects, led by the PI, submitted and under peer-review evaluation.
+- **Attachments.** additional documents corresponding to formulas, schemes, diagrams, graphics, images and support letters.
+
+### Indicators
+
+- **Expected Output Indicators.**
+  - outputs should be realistic and achievable and include publications, communications, reports, organization of seminars, advanced training and others.
+  -  used to evaluate the adequacy of the final results to the results foreseen in the application
+- **Dissemination**
+  - plan for disseminating results and promoting knowledge and scientific dissemination
+  - plan for disseminating knowledge transfer
+  - included in the expected indicators and include actions for
+    - disseminating scientific culture,
+    - promoting and disseminating knowledge, 
+    - technical/scientific publications, 
+    - conferences, 
+    - seminars, 
+    - forums, and 
+    - actions aimed at target sectors, or 
+    - others
+
+### Budget
+
+- filled in by item
+- global values and justification of budgetary needs declared for each task
+- account the funding limit and the basic eligibility criteria
+- Lump Sum budget information will serve exclusively for the evaluation of the reasonableness and feasibility of the project
+
+- **Principal Contractor**  fill in the requested funding for each budget category along with the corresponding justification.
+- **Funding Plan** Global Budget and Funding Plan tables that are automatically filled out
+
+### Statement of Commitment
+
+- Mark the respective check box.
+
+### Validate and Submit
+
+- The presence of errors prevents the submission of the application.
+
+## After Submission
+
+> Is this to be done by me?
+
+### Statement of Commitment from the Principal Contractor
+
+- available on myFCT for the respective agreement by the highest authority of the institution or someone delegated by them after the deadline for submitting applications and until **5:00 PM, Lisbon time, of March 1st, 2024** - WHAT?
+- Portal de Ciência e Tecnologia (PCT)
+
+### Delegation of Access in the PCT
+
+### Acceptance of Applications in myFCT
+
+
+## Tarefas
+
+- [ ] Prepare the application carefully and timely.
+- [ ] Read carefully the instructions provided in this Guide and in the Application form.
+- [ ] Learn about the structure of the Application form before beginning filling it in. Read all the sections of the Application form in advance, in order to have an idea of what is being asked and to have the necessary time to gather all the information required for submission.
+- [ ] Make sure that all the institutions to be included in the application are available on the Application form. If they are not on the list, they have to be added through the Registration of Institutions form via the Portal de Ciência e Tecnologia (available only in Portuguese). It can take up to two working days for a new institution to become available once the form is filled.
+- [ ] Contact the researchers to be included in the application team in advance and ask them to register on the CIÊNCIA ID platform and to provide the applicant with the CIÊNCIA ID registration email address.
+- [ ] Make sure an updated version of CIÊNCIAVITAE is available and ensure that the same goes for all members associated to the research team of the project.
+- [ ] Make sure that each Institution selected in the application form has a team member associated.
+- [ ] Prepare the Lump Sum funding of the application carefully and adequately.
+- [ ] Ensure that the URL addresses of bibliographical references or other relevant material remain active throughout the decision-making process.
+- [ ] Do not assume that the form and rules for submission of this application are the same as those used in other FCT programs or by other funding Agencies.
+- [ ] Do not wait until the last minute to validate and make any corrections to the application. There is a myFCT validation process, to detect possible errors in your application, which can implicate corrections and the need for extra time. Please repeat this validation process regularly.
+- [ ] Plan and complete the application process as early as possible. Only in this way FCT will be able to provide the best possible assistance.
+- [ ] Visit the FCT website regularly for updated information regarding the Call.
+- [ ] Write the application in such a way as to convince the panel of experts that the ideas presented deserve to be funded.Write the application in such a way as to convince the panel of experts that the ideas presented deserve to be funded.
+- [ ] It is important to describe the institutions involved in the project and their respective skills and contribution to the development of the project.
+- [ ] Remember that the application represents a commitment, not only from the Principal Investigator, but also from the entire research team.
+- [ ] Be realistic in terms of expectations and, if the proposal is approved, make sure that the research team is able to carry it out as planned in the application.
+- [ ] Read the Guide for Peer Reviewers carefully to understand how the application will be evaluated and make sure that the application addresses those crucial points.
+- [ ] Avoid repeating the same text or entire paragraphs in different sections.
+
+## Testemunhos
+
+- [ ] Comprovativo de Doutoramento do PI
+- [ ] Vínculo Laboras com o Principal Contractor ()
+
+## Agenda
+
+```gantt
+title       Zugzwang
+dateformat  YYYY-MM-DD
+
+section Milestones
+  milestone1    :ms1, 1d
+  milestone2    : after ms1, 1d
+```
+## Avaliação
+
+1. Qualidade científica (A1) e carácter inovador (A2) do projeto numa ótica internacional.
+2. Mérito científico do/a IR e da equipa de investigação (B1), incluindo impacto da execução do projeto no desenvolvimento da carreira do IR e/ou da sua investigação (B2).
+3. Exequibilidade do programa de trabalhos e dos indicadores de realização propostos (C1), assim como razoabilidade orçamental (C2).
+
+O mérito do projeto é obtido através de:
+
+```
+MP =  0,40 (0,50 A1 + 0,50 A2) + 
+      0,35 (0,60 B1 + 0,40 B2) + 
+      0,25 (0,50 C1 + 0,50 C2)
+```
+
+## Questões
+
+- O _Principal Contractor_ é a UÉvora ou o NOVALINCS?
+- 
  
 ## 2024-01-05 - Next Research Lines
  
@@ -45,6 +236,8 @@ Consider:
  
 ##### Line 1c - The equivalence relation
  
+Previous work defines one specific equivalence relation in the events associated to a ASP program to score that program but other equivalence relations can provide more effective scoring algorithms. 
+
 Consider the cases where only $s \subseteq e$ and $e \subseteq s$. Or other refinements. Also consider the inconsistent and independent events.
  
 ##### Line 1d - Stability of the error function
@@ -103,7 +296,7 @@ Scoring programs, as described in our paper, is just a step into **Inductive Log
 - [ ] Submeter
 - [ ] Redigir
 - [ ] Preparar
-  - [ ] Consultar documentação
+  - [-] Consultar documentação
   - [ ] Reunir requisitos
   - [ ] Delinear proposta
  
@@ -0,0 +1,253 @@
+# Tasks
+
+## Task List
+
+### Task LPSP
+
+- **Denomination**
+  -  Logic Programs Structure and Properties
+- **Description and expected results:**
+    - **Objectives**: Clarify the role of logic program structure, eg stratified, or recursive  programs or functional symbols, in the equivalence relation of events classes. 
+    - **Methods**: Investigate the types of logic program structures, how they affect known ILP systems and what is the relationship with our approach.
+    - **Expected Results**: Two papers accepted in A* or A international conferences or Q1 journals.
+    - **Links to other tasks**: [TODO] (preconditions and results)
+    - **Partners and Institution Roles**: Universidade de Évora [TODO] [ROLES]
+    - **Justification for the needed resources**: Members should present the results in international conferences, requiring support for registration, travel, accommodation and food.
+- **Assigned team members:**
+  - Francisco Coelho, Universidade de Évora
+  - Bruno Dinis, Universidade de Évora
+  - Salvador Abreu, Universidade de Évora
+- **Person*Month:**
+  - [TODO]
+- **Deliverables:**
+  - Paper ONE in International Conference: M08
+- **Budget**
+  - Registration, travel, accommodation and food for conference ONE: 3000,00€
+  - Total, including 25% overheads: 3750,00€
+
+### Task LPEQ
+
+- **Denomination**
+  - The Role of Equivalence Relations in Scoring Programs
+- **Description and expected results**
+    - **Objectives**: Clarify the role of the equivalence relation, used to partition the event space, in the performance of methods and applications. 
+    - **Methods**: Investigate variations of the equivalence relation, eg considering only super-events instead of super- and sub-events, and the resulting effects.
+    - **Expected Results**: One paper accepted in A* or A international conference or Q1 journal.
+    - **Links to other tasks**: [TODO] (preconditions and results)
+    - **Partners and Institution Roles**: Universidade de Évora [TODO] [ROLES]
+    - **Justification for the needed resources**: A member should present the results in an international conference, requiring support for registration, travel, accommodation and food.
+- **Assigned team members**
+  - Francisco Coelho, Universidade de Évora
+  - Bruno Dinis, Universidade de Évora
+- **Person*Month**
+  - [TODO]
+- **Deliverables**
+  - Paper TWO in International Conference: M09 - M17
+- **Budget**
+  - Registration, travel, accommodation and food for conference TWO: 3000,00€
+  - Total, including 25% overheads: 3750,00€
+
+### Task LPERR
+
+- **Denomination**
+  - The Role of the Error Function
+- **Description and expected results**
+    - **Objectives**: Explore the role of the error function, used to score a probabilistic ASP wrt observations, in the performance of methods and applications.
+    - **Methods**: Investigate variations of the error function, eg Kullback-Leibler divergence instead of the L2 used, observation sets form various domains, and the resulting effects.
+    - **Expected Results**: One paper accepted in A* or A international conference or Q1 journal.
+    - **Links to other tasks**: [TODO] (preconditions and results)
+    - **Partners and Institution Roles**: Universidade de Évora [TODO] [ROLES]
+    - **Justification for the needed resources**: A member should present the results in an international conference, requiring support for registration, travel, accommodation and food.
+- **Assigned team members**
+  - Francisco Coelho, Universidade de Évora
+  - Ligia Henriques-Rodrigues, Universidade de Évora
+- **Person*Month**
+  - [TODO]
+- **Deliverables**
+  - Paper THREE in International Conference: M01 - M08
+- **Budget**
+  - Registration, travel, accommodation and food for conference THREE: 3000,00€
+  - Total, including 25% overheads: 3750,00€
+
+### Task ISASTSE
+
+- **Denomination**
+  - Inductive Stochastic Answer Set Programs by Space Exploration
+- **Description and expected results**
+    - **Objectives**: Proceed from scoring programs to induce ASP programs using genetic algorithms or other program space exploration methods.
+    - **Methods**: Investigate program transformation and program space exploration methods and rules.  
+    - **Expected Results**: One paper accepted in A* or A international conference or Q1 journal.
+    - **Links to other tasks**: [TODO] (preconditions and results)
+    - **Partners and Institution Roles**: Universidade de Évora [TODO] [ROLES]
+    - **Justification for the needed resources**:  A member should present the results in an international conference, requiring support for registration, travel, accommodation and food.
+- **Assigned team members**
+  - Francisco Coelho, Universidade de Évora
+  - Salvador Abreu, Universidade de Évora
+- **Person*Month**
+  - [TODO]
+- **Deliverables**
+  - Paper FOUR in International Conference: M01 - M09
+- **Budget**
+  - Registration, travel, accommodation and food for conference FOUR: 3000,00€
+  - Total, including 25% overheads: 3750,00€
+
+### Task ISF
+
+- **Denomination**
+  - Integration with existing ASP and ILP software frameworks
+- **Description and expected results**
+    - **Objectives**: Exploit and contribute to existing ASP frameworks, such as Potassco.
+    - **Methods**: Implement a library to parse the ASP language extended with probabilistic annotations; utilize existing ASP frameworks to compute stable models; compute the event classes and respective probabilities.
+    - **Expected Results**: A library, and the respective API, to parse extended ASP; interface with existing ASP frameworks; compute event classes and respective probabilities.
+    - **Links to other tasks**: 
+      - Result: Task HPC; deliverable: Library API
+    - **Partners and Institution Roles**: Universidade de Évora [TODO] [ROLES]
+    - **Justification for the needed resources**:
+      - The implementation amount and complexity requires a fulltime PhD student working over a year, using a suitable laptop.
+- **Assigned team members**
+  - Francisco Coelho, Universidade de Évora
+  - BI Scholarship fellow, Universidade de Évora
+- **Person*Month**
+  - [TODO]
+- **Deliverables**
+  - Software Library Repository: M03 - M15
+  - Library API:  M06
+  - Implementation Report: M16
+- **Budget**
+  - Laptop computer:   2600,00€
+  - BI Scholarship:   13735,68€ = 1144,64€ x 12 months 
+  - Total, including 25% overheads: 20419,60€
+
+### Task HPC
+
+- **Denomination**
+  - High Performance Computing for Induction and Use of SASP
+- **Description and expected results**
+    - **Objectives**: Use High Performance Computing systems to speedup and scale-up applications of our methods.
+    - **Methods**: Benchmark the benefits of data and process distribution on High Performance Computing systems. 
+    - **Expected Results**: Report on the performance of the distributed versions of the programs to interface with existing ASP frameworks and compute event classes and respective probabilities.  
+    - **Links to other tasks**:
+      -  Precondition: Task ISF; Deliverable: Library API
+    - **Partners and Institution Roles**: 
+      - Universidade de Évora [ROLES]
+      - High Performance Computing Chair [ROLES]
+    - **Justification for the needed resources**: [TODO]
+- **Assigned team members**
+  - Francisco Coelho, Universidade de Évora
+  - Miguel Avillez, High Performance Computing Chair
+- **Person*Month**
+  - [TODO]
+- **Deliverables**
+  - Software Library Repository: M06 - M18
+  - Implementation Report: M18
+- **Budget**
+  - [TODO] Item justification (criteria of N.4 from "Public Announcement of the Call")
+  - [TODO] Amount requested for the task: Include 25% overheads; Consistent with the _Principal Contractor Budget table in application form_; Ensure "total amount of funding requested by institution" = "total costs of the tasks in which the institution participates"
+
+### Task APPT
+
+- **Denomination**
+  - Applications of Stochastic ASP in Theoretic Scenarios
+- **Description and expected results**
+    - **Objectives**: [TODO]
+    - **Methods**: [TODO]
+    - **Expected Results**: [TODO]
+    - **Links to other tasks**: [TODO] (preconditions and results)
+    - **Partners and Institution Roles**: Universidade de Évora [TODO] [ROLES]
+    - **Justification for the needed resources**: [TODO]
+- **Assigned team members**
+  - [TODO] Member
+- **Person*Month**
+  - [TODO]
+- **Deliverables**
+  - [TODO]Type  and Description; evidences and results
+- **Budget**
+  - [TODO] Item justification (criteria of N.4 from "Public Announcement of the Call")
+  - [TODO] Amount requested for the task: Include 25% overheads; Consistent with the _Principal Contractor Budget table in application form_; Ensure "total amount of funding requested by institution" = "total costs of the tasks in which the institution participates"
+
+### Task APPS
+
+- **Denomination**
+  - Applications of Stochastic ASP in Statistic Tasks
+- **Description and expected results**
+    - **Objectives**: [TODO]
+    - **Methods**: [TODO]
+    - **Expected Results**: [TODO]
+    - **Links to other tasks**: [TODO] (preconditions and results)
+    - **Partners and Institution Roles**: Universidade de Évora [TODO] [ROLES]
+    - **Justification for the needed resources**: [TODO]
+- **Assigned team members**
+  - [TODO] Member
+- **Person*Month**
+  - [TODO]
+- **Deliverables**
+  - [TODO]Type  and Description; evidences and results
+- **Budget**
+  - [TODO] Item justification (criteria of N.4 from "Public Announcement of the Call")
+  - [TODO] Amount requested for the task: Include 25% overheads; Consistent with the _Principal Contractor Budget table in application form_; Ensure "total amount of funding requested by institution" = "total costs of the tasks in which the institution participates"
+
+### Task APPW
+
+- **Denomination**
+  - Applications of Stochastic ASP in Real World Cases 
+- **Description and expected results**
+    - **Objectives**: [TODO]
+    - **Methods**: [TODO]
+    - **Expected Results**: [TODO]
+    - **Links to other tasks**: [TODO] (preconditions and results)
+    - **Partners and Institution Roles**: Universidade de Évora [TODO] [ROLES]
+    - **Justification for the needed resources**: [TODO]
+- **Assigned team members**
+  - [TODO] Member
+- **Person*Month**
+  - [TODO]
+- **Deliverables**
+  - [TODO]Type  and Description; evidences and results
+- **Budget**
+  - [TODO] Item justification (criteria of N.4 from "Public Announcement of the Call")
+  - [TODO] Amount requested for the task: Include 25% overheads; Consistent with the _Principal Contractor Budget table in application form_; Ensure "total amount of funding requested by institution" = "total costs of the tasks in which the institution participates"
+
+### Task TaskID
+
+- **Denomination**
+  - [TODO] concise and self-explanatory
+- **Description and expected results**
+    - **Objectives**: [TODO]
+    - **Methods**: [TODO]
+    - **Expected Results**: [TODO]
+    - **Links to other tasks**: [TODO] (preconditions and results)
+    - **Partners and Institution Roles**: Universidade de Évora [TODO] [ROLES]
+    - **Justification for the needed resources**: [TODO]
+- **Assigned team members**
+  - [TODO] Member
+- **Person*Month**
+  - [TODO]
+- **Deliverables**
+  - [TODO]Type  and Description; evidences and results
+- **Budget**
+  - [TODO] Item justification (criteria of N.4 from "Public Announcement of the Call")
+  - [TODO] Amount requested for the task: Include 25% overheads; Consistent with the _Principal Contractor Budget table in application form_; Ensure "total amount of funding requested by institution" = "total costs of the tasks in which the institution participates"
+
+## Project Timeline
+
+```gantt
+title       IAM
+dateFormat  YYYY-MM-DD
+
+section Tasks
+
+  task1   :a1, 2024-09-01, 30d
+```
+
+- **Project timeline and management.** list of milestones, the timeline and the description of the management structure
+  - **Milestones list**
+    - milestone = objective achieved; phase completed; result obtained
+    - include what can be demonstrated or reported on that date
+    - up to 6 milestones
+    - select tasks associated with the milestone
+    - mark milestones on the **timeline**.
+  - **Timeline**
+    - start with the available spreadsheet
+    - upload "timeline.pdf"
+    - Indicate **partner responsible for task**; **acronyms of partners involved**
+  - **Management** project management structure: coordination; meetings; reporting structure
 \ No newline at end of file
@@ -14,6 +14,7 @@
 		"cSpell.words": [
 			"biblatex",
 			"CREDAL",
+			"Hirings",
 			"interpretability",
 			"println",
 			"stablecore",
...	...	@@ -0,0 +1 @@
	1	+{"url": "https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1rI6KWeT19Wcw7CTuUIyQNenzpTsW4VhBXbRtGVBFn6k/edit?usp=drivesdk", "file_id": "1rI6KWeT19Wcw7CTuUIyQNenzpTsW4VhBXbRtGVBFn6k", "account_email": "mangon@gmail.com"}
0	2	\ No newline at end of file
...	...
1	1	# Candidatura PEx - Zugzwang
2	2
	3	+## Filling Application Form
	4	+
	5	+### General Data
	6	+
	7	+- Title: Induction of Stochastic Answer Set Programs by Algebraic Means
	8	+- Project Acronym: IAM
	9	+- Keywords: (<= 4)
	10	+- Main Scientific Area (Sci Domain + Sci Area + Sci sub-area):
	11	+- Timetable: (Start date + duration)
	12	+
	13	+### Institutions
	14	+
	15	+- Principal Contractor: (NIPC; Research Unit; description; competencies)
	16	+- Collaborative Institutions: (All in the Portal de Ciência e Tecnologia?)
	17	+
	18	+### Research Team
	19	+
	20	+- Principal Investigator (name; role; ciencia Id; ciencia vitae in english)
	21	+- PI narrative CV:
	22	+ - Contributions to the generation of new ideas, tools, methodologies, or knowledge
	23	+ - Contributions to the development of individuals and/or research teams
	24	+ - Contributions to the research community and the broader society
	25	+ - Selected outputs and/or activities
	26	+ - Why would this grant be timely for me, at this point in my career path and/or in my research?
	27	+- Members: (email; institution)
	28	+- Hirings: (type (contract or scholarship); institution associated with the hiring)
	29	+- Consultants: (email; framework fo participation)
	30	+- Team CV synopsis: (justify the framework and competencies of the research team and its coherence with the proposed work plan)
	31	+ - team scientific activity last 5 years
	32	+ - most relevant scientific achievements
	33	+ - demonstrate competence in the area
	34	+
	35	+### Work Plan
	36	+
	37	+- Abstract. summary in portugues and english; analysis state of the art; main goals; knowledge and skills in the group; strategy and methodologies; novelty; expected results.
	38	+- State of the art and Objectives. overview of PI research field; state of the art in connection with ground-breaking nature and potential impact; references to PI previous work:
	39	+ - To what extent does the proposed research address important challenges?
	40	+ - To what extent are the objectives ambitious and beyond the state of the art (e.g. novel concepts and approaches or development between or across disciplines)?
	41	+- Research plan and methods.
	42	+ - To what extent is the outlined scientific approach feasible bearing in mind the originality and/or ground-breaking potential of the proposed research?
	43	+ - To what extent are the proposed research methodology and working arrangements appropriate to achieve the goals of the project?
	44	+ - To what extent are the proposed timelines, resources, and PI´s commitment adequate and properly justified?
	45	+- Bibliographic references. (references cited in the state of art and in the research plan and methods)
	46	+- Past publications. (five publications; articles, books or monographs published or accepted for publication, authored or co-authored by the PI and the members of the research team)
	47	+- Tasks.
	48	+ - Task denomination, concise and self-explanatory
	49	+ - Task description and expected results
	50	+ - objectives in the context of the project
	51	+ - methodologies and approaches
	52	+ - expected results and preconditions to subsequent tasks
	53	+ - link to other tasks (?)
	54	+ - role of each partner and institution
	55	+ - justification for the needed resources (human and material)
	56	+ - Assigned team members.
	57	+ - *Personmonth** person's percentage dedication * task duration in months
	58	+ - Start date; duration (in months) -_no period without tasks_
	59	+ - Deliverables; delivery dates (essential for effective project monitoring)
	60	+ - type (report; data management plan; websites; etc)
	61	+ - _Lump sums are paid based on evidence and results showing achieved deliverables and budged_
	62	+ - Budgets.
	63	+ - Overall cost justification of the task
	64	+ - breakdown by budget item detail of how this value is obtained
	65	+ - estimates must meet eligibility criteria of N.4 from "Public Announcement of the Call"
	66	+ - Amount requested for the task
	67	+ - Include 25% overheads
	68	+ - Consistent with the _Principal Contractor Budget table in application form_
	69	+ - Ensure "total amount of funding requested by institution" = "total costs of the tasks in which the institution participates"
	70	+- Project timeline and management. list of milestones, the timeline and the description of the management structure
	71	+ - Milestones list
	72	+ - milestone = objective achieved; phase completed; result obtained
	73	+ - include what can be demonstrated or reported on that date
	74	+ - up to 6 milestones
	75	+ - select tasks associated with the milestone
	76	+ - mark milestones on the timeline.
	77	+ - Timeline
	78	+ - start with the available spreadsheet
	79	+ - upload "timeline.pdf"
	80	+ - Indicate partner responsible for task; acronyms of partners involved
	81	+ - Management project management structure: coordination; meetings; reporting structure
	82	+- Ethical issues. are any ethical issues identified in the project?
	83	+- 2030 Agenda. Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)
	84	+ - identify one, or up to a maximum of three, of the 17 Sustainable
	85	+Development Goals of the United Nations 2030 Agenda and justify how the application fits into the selected SDGs.
	86	+- Other projects. Projects approved through peer review, led by the PI and started less than 5 years ago, completed or in progress should be listed. Additionally, please detail all projects, led by the PI, submitted and under peer-review evaluation.
	87	+- Attachments. additional documents corresponding to formulas, schemes, diagrams, graphics, images and support letters.
	88	+
	89	+### Indicators
	90	+
	91	+- Expected Output Indicators.
	92	+ - outputs should be realistic and achievable and include publications, communications, reports, organization of seminars, advanced training and others.
	93	+ - used to evaluate the adequacy of the final results to the results foreseen in the application
	94	+- Dissemination
	95	+ - plan for disseminating results and promoting knowledge and scientific dissemination
	96	+ - plan for disseminating knowledge transfer
	97	+ - included in the expected indicators and include actions for
	98	+ - disseminating scientific culture,
	99	+ - promoting and disseminating knowledge,
	100	+ - technical/scientific publications,
	101	+ - conferences,
	102	+ - seminars,
	103	+ - forums, and
	104	+ - actions aimed at target sectors, or
	105	+ - others
	106	+
	107	+### Budget
	108	+
	109	+- filled in by item
	110	+- global values and justification of budgetary needs declared for each task
	111	+- account the funding limit and the basic eligibility criteria
	112	+- Lump Sum budget information will serve exclusively for the evaluation of the reasonableness and feasibility of the project
	113	+
	114	+- Principal Contractor fill in the requested funding for each budget category along with the corresponding justification.
	115	+- Funding Plan Global Budget and Funding Plan tables that are automatically filled out
	116	+
	117	+### Statement of Commitment
	118	+
	119	+- Mark the respective check box.
	120	+
	121	+### Validate and Submit
	122	+
	123	+- The presence of errors prevents the submission of the application.
	124	+
	125	+## After Submission
	126	+
	127	+> Is this to be done by me?
	128	+
	129	+### Statement of Commitment from the Principal Contractor
	130	+
	131	+- available on myFCT for the respective agreement by the highest authority of the institution or someone delegated by them after the deadline for submitting applications and until 5:00 PM, Lisbon time, of March 1st, 2024 - WHAT?
	132	+- Portal de Ciência e Tecnologia (PCT)
	133	+
	134	+### Delegation of Access in the PCT
	135	+
	136	+### Acceptance of Applications in myFCT
	137	+
	138	+
	139	+## Tarefas
	140	+
	141	+- [ ] Prepare the application carefully and timely.
	142	+- [ ] Read carefully the instructions provided in this Guide and in the Application form.
	143	+- [ ] Learn about the structure of the Application form before beginning filling it in. Read all the sections of the Application form in advance, in order to have an idea of what is being asked and to have the necessary time to gather all the information required for submission.
	144	+- [ ] Make sure that all the institutions to be included in the application are available on the Application form. If they are not on the list, they have to be added through the Registration of Institutions form via the Portal de Ciência e Tecnologia (available only in Portuguese). It can take up to two working days for a new institution to become available once the form is filled.
	145	+- [ ] Contact the researchers to be included in the application team in advance and ask them to register on the CIÊNCIA ID platform and to provide the applicant with the CIÊNCIA ID registration email address.
	146	+- [ ] Make sure an updated version of CIÊNCIAVITAE is available and ensure that the same goes for all members associated to the research team of the project.
	147	+- [ ] Make sure that each Institution selected in the application form has a team member associated.
	148	+- [ ] Prepare the Lump Sum funding of the application carefully and adequately.
	149	+- [ ] Ensure that the URL addresses of bibliographical references or other relevant material remain active throughout the decision-making process.
	150	+- [ ] Do not assume that the form and rules for submission of this application are the same as those used in other FCT programs or by other funding Agencies.
	151	+- [ ] Do not wait until the last minute to validate and make any corrections to the application. There is a myFCT validation process, to detect possible errors in your application, which can implicate corrections and the need for extra time. Please repeat this validation process regularly.
	152	+- [ ] Plan and complete the application process as early as possible. Only in this way FCT will be able to provide the best possible assistance.
	153	+- [ ] Visit the FCT website regularly for updated information regarding the Call.
	154	+- [ ] Write the application in such a way as to convince the panel of experts that the ideas presented deserve to be funded.Write the application in such a way as to convince the panel of experts that the ideas presented deserve to be funded.
	155	+- [ ] It is important to describe the institutions involved in the project and their respective skills and contribution to the development of the project.
	156	+- [ ] Remember that the application represents a commitment, not only from the Principal Investigator, but also from the entire research team.
	157	+- [ ] Be realistic in terms of expectations and, if the proposal is approved, make sure that the research team is able to carry it out as planned in the application.
	158	+- [ ] Read the Guide for Peer Reviewers carefully to understand how the application will be evaluated and make sure that the application addresses those crucial points.
	159	+- [ ] Avoid repeating the same text or entire paragraphs in different sections.
	160	+
	161	+## Testemunhos
	162	+
	163	+- [ ] Comprovativo de Doutoramento do PI
	164	+- [ ] Vínculo Laboras com o Principal Contractor ()
	165	+
	166	+## Agenda
	167	+
	168	+```gantt
	169	+title Zugzwang
	170	+dateformat YYYY-MM-DD
	171	+
	172	+section Milestones
	173	+ milestone1 :ms1, 1d
	174	+ milestone2 : after ms1, 1d
	175	+```
	176	+## Avaliação
	177	+
	178	+1. Qualidade científica (A1) e carácter inovador (A2) do projeto numa ótica internacional.
	179	+2. Mérito científico do/a IR e da equipa de investigação (B1), incluindo impacto da execução do projeto no desenvolvimento da carreira do IR e/ou da sua investigação (B2).
	180	+3. Exequibilidade do programa de trabalhos e dos indicadores de realização propostos (C1), assim como razoabilidade orçamental (C2).
	181	+
	182	+O mérito do projeto é obtido através de:
	183	+
	184	+```
	185	+MP = 0,40 (0,50 A1 + 0,50 A2) +
	186	+ 0,35 (0,60 B1 + 0,40 B2) +
	187	+ 0,25 (0,50 C1 + 0,50 C2)
	188	+```
	189	+
	190	+## Questões
	191	+
	192	+- O _Principal Contractor_ é a UÉvora ou o NOVALINCS?
	193	+-
3	194
4	195	## 2024-01-05 - Next Research Lines
5	196
...	...	@@ -45,6 +236,8 @@ Consider:
45	236
46	237	##### Line 1c - The equivalence relation
47	238
	239	+Previous work defines one specific equivalence relation in the events associated to a ASP program to score that program but other equivalence relations can provide more effective scoring algorithms.
	240	+
48	241	Consider the cases where only $s \subseteq e$ and $e \subseteq s$. Or other refinements. Also consider the inconsistent and independent events.
49	242
50	243	##### Line 1d - Stability of the error function
...	...	@@ -103,7 +296,7 @@ Scoring programs, as described in our paper, is just a step into **Inductive Log
103	296	- [ ] Submeter
104	297	- [ ] Redigir
105	298	- [ ] Preparar
106		- - [ ] Consultar documentação
	299	+ - [-] Consultar documentação
107	300	- [ ] Reunir requisitos
108	301	- [ ] Delinear proposta
109	302
...	...
...	...	@@ -0,0 +1,253 @@
	1	+# Tasks
	2	+
	3	+## Task List
	4	+
	5	+### Task LPSP
	6	+
	7	+- Denomination
	8	+ - Logic Programs Structure and Properties
	9	+- Description and expected results:
	10	+ - Objectives: Clarify the role of logic program structure, eg stratified, or recursive programs or functional symbols, in the equivalence relation of events classes.
	11	+ - Methods: Investigate the types of logic program structures, how they affect known ILP systems and what is the relationship with our approach.
	12	+ - Expected Results: Two papers accepted in A* or A international conferences or Q1 journals.
	13	+ - Links to other tasks: [TODO] (preconditions and results)
	14	+ - Partners and Institution Roles: Universidade de Évora [TODO] [ROLES]
	15	+ - Justification for the needed resources: Members should present the results in international conferences, requiring support for registration, travel, accommodation and food.
	16	+- Assigned team members:
	17	+ - Francisco Coelho, Universidade de Évora
	18	+ - Bruno Dinis, Universidade de Évora
	19	+ - Salvador Abreu, Universidade de Évora
	20	+- *PersonMonth:**
	21	+ - [TODO]
	22	+- Deliverables:
	23	+ - Paper ONE in International Conference: M08
	24	+- Budget
	25	+ - Registration, travel, accommodation and food for conference ONE: 3000,00€
	26	+ - Total, including 25% overheads: 3750,00€
	27	+
	28	+### Task LPEQ
	29	+
	30	+- Denomination
	31	+ - The Role of Equivalence Relations in Scoring Programs
	32	+- Description and expected results
	33	+ - Objectives: Clarify the role of the equivalence relation, used to partition the event space, in the performance of methods and applications.
	34	+ - Methods: Investigate variations of the equivalence relation, eg considering only super-events instead of super- and sub-events, and the resulting effects.
	35	+ - Expected Results: One paper accepted in A* or A international conference or Q1 journal.
	36	+ - Links to other tasks: [TODO] (preconditions and results)
	37	+ - Partners and Institution Roles: Universidade de Évora [TODO] [ROLES]
	38	+ - Justification for the needed resources: A member should present the results in an international conference, requiring support for registration, travel, accommodation and food.
	39	+- Assigned team members
	40	+ - Francisco Coelho, Universidade de Évora
	41	+ - Bruno Dinis, Universidade de Évora
	42	+- *PersonMonth**
	43	+ - [TODO]
	44	+- Deliverables
	45	+ - Paper TWO in International Conference: M09 - M17
	46	+- Budget
	47	+ - Registration, travel, accommodation and food for conference TWO: 3000,00€
	48	+ - Total, including 25% overheads: 3750,00€
	49	+
	50	+### Task LPERR
	51	+
	52	+- Denomination
	53	+ - The Role of the Error Function
	54	+- Description and expected results
	55	+ - Objectives: Explore the role of the error function, used to score a probabilistic ASP wrt observations, in the performance of methods and applications.
	56	+ - Methods: Investigate variations of the error function, eg Kullback-Leibler divergence instead of the L2 used, observation sets form various domains, and the resulting effects.
	57	+ - Expected Results: One paper accepted in A* or A international conference or Q1 journal.
	58	+ - Links to other tasks: [TODO] (preconditions and results)
	59	+ - Partners and Institution Roles: Universidade de Évora [TODO] [ROLES]
	60	+ - Justification for the needed resources: A member should present the results in an international conference, requiring support for registration, travel, accommodation and food.
	61	+- Assigned team members
	62	+ - Francisco Coelho, Universidade de Évora
	63	+ - Ligia Henriques-Rodrigues, Universidade de Évora
	64	+- *PersonMonth**
	65	+ - [TODO]
	66	+- Deliverables
	67	+ - Paper THREE in International Conference: M01 - M08
	68	+- Budget
	69	+ - Registration, travel, accommodation and food for conference THREE: 3000,00€
	70	+ - Total, including 25% overheads: 3750,00€
	71	+
	72	+### Task ISASTSE
	73	+
	74	+- Denomination
	75	+ - Inductive Stochastic Answer Set Programs by Space Exploration
	76	+- Description and expected results
	77	+ - Objectives: Proceed from scoring programs to induce ASP programs using genetic algorithms or other program space exploration methods.
	78	+ - Methods: Investigate program transformation and program space exploration methods and rules.
	79	+ - Expected Results: One paper accepted in A* or A international conference or Q1 journal.
	80	+ - Links to other tasks: [TODO] (preconditions and results)
	81	+ - Partners and Institution Roles: Universidade de Évora [TODO] [ROLES]
	82	+ - Justification for the needed resources: A member should present the results in an international conference, requiring support for registration, travel, accommodation and food.
	83	+- Assigned team members
	84	+ - Francisco Coelho, Universidade de Évora
	85	+ - Salvador Abreu, Universidade de Évora
	86	+- *PersonMonth**
	87	+ - [TODO]
	88	+- Deliverables
	89	+ - Paper FOUR in International Conference: M01 - M09
	90	+- Budget
	91	+ - Registration, travel, accommodation and food for conference FOUR: 3000,00€
	92	+ - Total, including 25% overheads: 3750,00€
	93	+
	94	+### Task ISF
	95	+
	96	+- Denomination
	97	+ - Integration with existing ASP and ILP software frameworks
	98	+- Description and expected results
	99	+ - Objectives: Exploit and contribute to existing ASP frameworks, such as Potassco.
	100	+ - Methods: Implement a library to parse the ASP language extended with probabilistic annotations; utilize existing ASP frameworks to compute stable models; compute the event classes and respective probabilities.
	101	+ - Expected Results: A library, and the respective API, to parse extended ASP; interface with existing ASP frameworks; compute event classes and respective probabilities.
	102	+ - Links to other tasks:
	103	+ - Result: Task HPC; deliverable: Library API
	104	+ - Partners and Institution Roles: Universidade de Évora [TODO] [ROLES]
	105	+ - Justification for the needed resources:
	106	+ - The implementation amount and complexity requires a fulltime PhD student working over a year, using a suitable laptop.
	107	+- Assigned team members
	108	+ - Francisco Coelho, Universidade de Évora
	109	+ - BI Scholarship fellow, Universidade de Évora
	110	+- *PersonMonth**
	111	+ - [TODO]
	112	+- Deliverables
	113	+ - Software Library Repository: M03 - M15
	114	+ - Library API: M06
	115	+ - Implementation Report: M16
	116	+- Budget
	117	+ - Laptop computer: 2600,00€
	118	+ - BI Scholarship: 13735,68€ = 1144,64€ x 12 months
	119	+ - Total, including 25% overheads: 20419,60€
	120	+
	121	+### Task HPC
	122	+
	123	+- Denomination
	124	+ - High Performance Computing for Induction and Use of SASP
	125	+- Description and expected results
	126	+ - Objectives: Use High Performance Computing systems to speedup and scale-up applications of our methods.
	127	+ - Methods: Benchmark the benefits of data and process distribution on High Performance Computing systems.
	128	+ - Expected Results: Report on the performance of the distributed versions of the programs to interface with existing ASP frameworks and compute event classes and respective probabilities.
	129	+ - Links to other tasks:
	130	+ - Precondition: Task ISF; Deliverable: Library API
	131	+ - Partners and Institution Roles:
	132	+ - Universidade de Évora [ROLES]
	133	+ - High Performance Computing Chair [ROLES]
	134	+ - Justification for the needed resources: [TODO]
	135	+- Assigned team members
	136	+ - Francisco Coelho, Universidade de Évora
	137	+ - Miguel Avillez, High Performance Computing Chair
	138	+- *PersonMonth**
	139	+ - [TODO]
	140	+- Deliverables
	141	+ - Software Library Repository: M06 - M18
	142	+ - Implementation Report: M18
	143	+- Budget
	144	+ - [TODO] Item justification (criteria of N.4 from "Public Announcement of the Call")
	145	+ - [TODO] Amount requested for the task: Include 25% overheads; Consistent with the _Principal Contractor Budget table in application form_; Ensure "total amount of funding requested by institution" = "total costs of the tasks in which the institution participates"
	146	+
	147	+### Task APPT
	148	+
	149	+- Denomination
	150	+ - Applications of Stochastic ASP in Theoretic Scenarios
	151	+- Description and expected results
	152	+ - Objectives: [TODO]
	153	+ - Methods: [TODO]
	154	+ - Expected Results: [TODO]
	155	+ - Links to other tasks: [TODO] (preconditions and results)
	156	+ - Partners and Institution Roles: Universidade de Évora [TODO] [ROLES]
	157	+ - Justification for the needed resources: [TODO]
	158	+- Assigned team members
	159	+ - [TODO] Member
	160	+- *PersonMonth**
	161	+ - [TODO]
	162	+- Deliverables
	163	+ - [TODO]Type and Description; evidences and results
	164	+- Budget
	165	+ - [TODO] Item justification (criteria of N.4 from "Public Announcement of the Call")
	166	+ - [TODO] Amount requested for the task: Include 25% overheads; Consistent with the _Principal Contractor Budget table in application form_; Ensure "total amount of funding requested by institution" = "total costs of the tasks in which the institution participates"
	167	+
	168	+### Task APPS
	169	+
	170	+- Denomination
	171	+ - Applications of Stochastic ASP in Statistic Tasks
	172	+- Description and expected results
	173	+ - Objectives: [TODO]
	174	+ - Methods: [TODO]
	175	+ - Expected Results: [TODO]
	176	+ - Links to other tasks: [TODO] (preconditions and results)
	177	+ - Partners and Institution Roles: Universidade de Évora [TODO] [ROLES]
	178	+ - Justification for the needed resources: [TODO]
	179	+- Assigned team members
	180	+ - [TODO] Member
	181	+- *PersonMonth**
	182	+ - [TODO]
	183	+- Deliverables
	184	+ - [TODO]Type and Description; evidences and results
	185	+- Budget
	186	+ - [TODO] Item justification (criteria of N.4 from "Public Announcement of the Call")
	187	+ - [TODO] Amount requested for the task: Include 25% overheads; Consistent with the _Principal Contractor Budget table in application form_; Ensure "total amount of funding requested by institution" = "total costs of the tasks in which the institution participates"
	188	+
	189	+### Task APPW
	190	+
	191	+- Denomination
	192	+ - Applications of Stochastic ASP in Real World Cases
	193	+- Description and expected results
	194	+ - Objectives: [TODO]
	195	+ - Methods: [TODO]
	196	+ - Expected Results: [TODO]
	197	+ - Links to other tasks: [TODO] (preconditions and results)
	198	+ - Partners and Institution Roles: Universidade de Évora [TODO] [ROLES]
	199	+ - Justification for the needed resources: [TODO]
	200	+- Assigned team members
	201	+ - [TODO] Member
	202	+- *PersonMonth**
	203	+ - [TODO]
	204	+- Deliverables
	205	+ - [TODO]Type and Description; evidences and results
	206	+- Budget
	207	+ - [TODO] Item justification (criteria of N.4 from "Public Announcement of the Call")
	208	+ - [TODO] Amount requested for the task: Include 25% overheads; Consistent with the _Principal Contractor Budget table in application form_; Ensure "total amount of funding requested by institution" = "total costs of the tasks in which the institution participates"
	209	+
	210	+### Task TaskID
	211	+
	212	+- Denomination
	213	+ - [TODO] concise and self-explanatory
	214	+- Description and expected results
	215	+ - Objectives: [TODO]
	216	+ - Methods: [TODO]
	217	+ - Expected Results: [TODO]
	218	+ - Links to other tasks: [TODO] (preconditions and results)
	219	+ - Partners and Institution Roles: Universidade de Évora [TODO] [ROLES]
	220	+ - Justification for the needed resources: [TODO]
	221	+- Assigned team members
	222	+ - [TODO] Member
	223	+- *PersonMonth**
	224	+ - [TODO]
	225	+- Deliverables
	226	+ - [TODO]Type and Description; evidences and results
	227	+- Budget
	228	+ - [TODO] Item justification (criteria of N.4 from "Public Announcement of the Call")
	229	+ - [TODO] Amount requested for the task: Include 25% overheads; Consistent with the _Principal Contractor Budget table in application form_; Ensure "total amount of funding requested by institution" = "total costs of the tasks in which the institution participates"
	230	+
	231	+## Project Timeline
	232	+
	233	+```gantt
	234	+title IAM
	235	+dateFormat YYYY-MM-DD
	236	+
	237	+section Tasks
	238	+
	239	+ task1 :a1, 2024-09-01, 30d
	240	+```
	241	+
	242	+- Project timeline and management. list of milestones, the timeline and the description of the management structure
	243	+ - Milestones list
	244	+ - milestone = objective achieved; phase completed; result obtained
	245	+ - include what can be demonstrated or reported on that date
	246	+ - up to 6 milestones
	247	+ - select tasks associated with the milestone
	248	+ - mark milestones on the timeline.
	249	+ - Timeline
	250	+ - start with the available spreadsheet
	251	+ - upload "timeline.pdf"
	252	+ - Indicate partner responsible for task; acronyms of partners involved
	253	+ - Management project management structure: coordination; meetings; reporting structure
0	254	\ No newline at end of file
...	...
...	...	@@ -14,6 +14,7 @@
14	14	"cSpell.words": [
15	15	"biblatex",
16	16	"CREDAL",
	17	+ "Hirings",
17	18	"interpretability",
18	19	"println",
19	20	"stablecore",
...	...